I'd say I hate letter grades, but that might be a little too strong. Maybe.
|
Photo courtesy ragesoss
CC BY-SA 2.0 |
For now I'll say I strongly dislike them, because it seems like no one really understands what grades mean.
I have a lot of thoughts about grading and assessment, actually. This might be the first post in a series because I have so many thoughts that I'm afraid it'll turn out to be something so long that no one will want to read it! Here are some of the questions I have been playing with for the past couple years, and continue to think about:
- What are grades for?
- How are grades generated?
- What are the shortcomings of commonly used assessment practices?
- What alternatives can we consider?
- How then shall we assess our students?
This past semester in my Science Methods class, I went completely off the rails and ranted about my strong dislike of letter grades. It was in the context of a discussion of assessment in science, and how we might use standards-based assessment to enhance learning in science. (This is a topic I love, and my Master's thesis was on standards-based assessment in science.) I apologized to my students for speaking so forcefully on the topic--most weren't offended anyway, and a few even told me later that they loved seeing my passion coming out. While I appreciate their good-natured response, it did get me thinking about
why I reacted so strongly. And I know what it is--when I was experimenting with standards-based grading in my science-teacher days, I got a lot of push back from a few colleagues who couldn't understand what I was doing. Because standards-based assessment is almost exactly but not entirely unlike more conventional assessment practices.
Not familiar with standards-based assessment? Here it is, in a nutshell: (copied and pasted from my old
class policies website--this is how I explained it to the middle schoolers... "Big Ideas" = standards)